Optional personal profile
Choose and revise interests, a goal and preferences. Start without a transcript.
Read the workflow and limits ←Explore each service: what it does today, its limits and what is planned next.
Choose and revise interests, a goal and preferences. Start without a transcript.
Read the workflow and limits ←Local extraction with missing-value, duplicate and grade checks, followed by student review. No institutional document authentication.
Read the workflow and limits ←Trace coursework to capabilities and pathway requirements, plus interest and goal context, with sources.
Read the workflow and limits ←Guided questions explain connections and missing evidence. Exploratory matching over a limited catalog, not a hiring decision or acceptance guarantee.
Read the workflow and limits ←Downloadable development steps and reference course comparisons where required evidence is available. No provider booking.
Read the workflow and limits ←Local keyword topic suggestions from text the student chooses to enter. Confirmation and separate contextual-use permission are required. Not personality analysis.
Read the workflow and limits ←Bilingual concepts, local SELECT/ASK queries, JSON-LD, Turtle and TriG graph exports, and CSV query results.
Read the workflow and limits ←Optional local storage, encrypted backups, import, consent withdrawal, deletion and a local activity log. No cloud account synchronization currently.
Read the workflow and limits ←The home page illustrates how interests, capabilities and projects intersect. No real person directory, contact or live social recommendation is implemented.
Read the workflow and limits ←Available pilot: optional multilingual semantic recall runs locally in your browser and returns candidates for evidence review. Structured project extraction, reranking and a GraphRAG guide remain planned and require evaluation.
Read the workflow and limits ←Valid RDF does not prove a recommendation is correct. This release has no general OWL reasoner, running SHACL engine, university integration or live recruitment integration. A three-college pilot is a validation goal, not a completed result.
Start with the synthetic example or explore reference knowledge without personal information.
Open the home pageReview requirements and sources, then accept exploratorily, reject, contest or leave unresolved. Decisions are local and withdrawable, with no skill-evidence upgrade. Export a test candidate from a contest without profile data; institutional contest handling is not active.
Review and contest stepsEvery extracted field keeps its original value, so edits and raised grades appear as self-declared wherever the capability is shown. PDFs and images are checked locally for signature, modification and QR signals with verification at the source. Available now; it does not prove authenticity or replace institutional verification.
From gap to evidence: record a project or certificate against a gap at the declared-applied level awaiting review. Unsigned portable export in the CLR 2.0 shape. Advisor review and issuer verification are not implemented yet.
Six tasks for three pathways on synthetic data, each with a rubric and a review scope, with progress saved locally. Available now as a proposed design scope; review by two HR and domain experts is pending, and no partnership or accreditation is claimed.
Pathway comparison, a local capability suggester measured on a frozen labelled set, and signed-credential import with local verification. Institutional advisor review is not operational; its design is published in the repository.